Posts Tagged ‘90’s’

Senna!

Mon ,24/03/2014

Finally got a chance to watch 2010’s Senna this past weekend with my father (the original car nut – I am only a pretender :)) This was a very interesting movie – although if you don’t care about car racing or F1 in particular, you may find it somewhat the opposite – be forewarned.

The movie details the rise of one of the world’s most famous and skilled car racers, Ayrton Senna of Brazil – who ultimately climbed to the top, claiming the F1 world title 3 times before his sad crash and death a few years later in the early 90’s. He was only 34 years old at the time.

Having been a perennial car mag subscriber at that time, what I mostly remember is that the press largely loathed Senna and constantly came to the aid (deserved or not) of his established rival, French driver Alain Prost. So as a result, I largely remembered Senna as a ‘bad guy’ who was hypercompetitive but largely an enigmatic jerk. I’m glad I watched this movie, because although it’s fairly pro-Senna in outlook, it’s a better look at the man himself, his era, the races and his rivalry with Prost.

While Senna, unlike some racers, did not come from poverty or even the middle class – his family was pretty well off before he started his career – he has to have been one of the most ‘driven’ [sic] car racers in history. There is even a scene in the movie where he all but tells off Jackie Stewart to his face about a controversial race, and manages to advocate for driver safety at the same time (which ultimately was his undoing in the crash, but inspired Stewart and others to force F1 to take safety seriously, and there have been no fatalities since).

What the movie also brings out (and the wikipedia article here) is that Senna had his causes too – he wasn’t just a rich playboy driver with the trapping of wealth to keep him amused (although he had some of that, too). He was an intensely personal man with strong religious beliefs, and it later turned out that he had donated literally millions to help poor children in Brazil throughout his career, especiallly when he became so famous and successful – but he did it very low-key, obviously because he cared about the cause and not the notoriety it would gain him.

And as observed by my dad – it’s kind of amazing the amount of footage in this movie – you’d think he had a camera crew on him the entire time he was in F1 nonstop – weird.

The movie doesn’t paint a positive picture of Prost – arguably he’s just as fierce a competitor – but he also reminded me of whiny NBA players complaining all the time when they don’t get their way – there are at least two major examples in the movie, one of which Prost actually managed to get a Senna victory overturned. It didn’t help (Senna) that the chief guy running F1 at the time was French – not at all (smirk). But as noted on wikipedia, even Senna forgave Prost in the end.

His end was pretty sad – but he certainly passed doing what he wanted to do, and ONLY what he wanted to do. It’s patronizing in some ways to say Senna was a complex man – because that’s what such personalities are always described as when we don’t completely understand them. But I’ll bite – he definitely was, and the sport was far poorer for his passing. Great movie!

R.I.P., Ayrton.

other voices:
Rotten Tomatoes
Metacritic
Christian Science Monitor

candybowl

The Everything Store.

Mon ,17/02/2014

So I saw a recent GeekWire post by local VC Nick Hanauer about Amazon:

Early Amazon.com investor says online retailer ‘probably destroyed a million jobs’

which is a nice segue to talking about the recent Amazon ‘bio’ by Brad Stone, The Everything Store: Jeff Bezos and the Age of Amazon. I finished reading this book last week – it’s a quick, informative and somewhat tell-all jaunt through Amazon’s history to date, focusing most closely on Jeff Bezos of course.

Having read the Steve Jobs book last year, there are a number of similarities, but also, key important differences between these two leaders and their respective companies.

While in both cases, each book had the tacit approval of its centerpiece, the Jobs book was done in far more direct cooperation than this one. Bezos never sat down with Brad Stone to review all these points and/or approve the manuscript himself prior to publication – but at the same time, he didn’t really stand in its way, either, and provided some key interviews as it developed, albeit not necessarily intended at the time to end up in a book later. Both Bezos and Jobs come across as extremely driven, sometimes focused on seemingly the tiniest minutiae (that can appear from the outside or in hindsight sometimes as misdirected vs. the bigger picture), and they both exhibit hyper, sometimes abusive mgmt styles that aren’t unique to the tech industry by any means, but it sure seems to draw these traits out more often than not, IMHO.

A contrast between the two, however is that Jobs perenially sought outside approval and support as a tastemaker, innovator and to be lionized as a tech industry leader in the products he created, oversaw or ‘appropriated’ (e.g. the Mac’s mouse-driven user interface) as he went along – Bezos arguably never did (or does). Bezos seems completely, utterly focused on one thing: his customers. And Bezos keeps his cards far closer to the vest in nearly everything he does (Amazon or otherwise), although given Amazon’s size now, that’s much more difficult than it might have been in the formative years – they are in many ways as big as Apple, Microsoft and other large tech rivals and their influence ranges even more broadly outside the tech industry (ask Walmart or other retail rivals – ask other cloud providers – the list goes on).

My reactions to this book were similar to that of the Jobs book – I felt it was pretty balanced, although possibly a little less sympathetic to Bezos than Isaacson was to Jobs – likely because Stone didn’t have the longterm journalistic relationship to Bezos that WI had with Jobs. I like that it tries to understand Bezos’ background (personal and professional) explaining him as a person and exploring his motivations – but with this guy, it’s far less obvious and far harder to do that in the end – Bezos is just more enigmatic and probably on purpose. Plus, while somewhat comfortable in the spotlight, he probably doesn’t deep down care about it much, again unlike Jobs. Neither person was/is a triumph of philanthropy – Apple only came to it after Jobs passed, Amazon arguably still has yet to. But contrast that with Bill Gates who also came to it (in a big, big way, to be fair) after he had relinquished nearly all major control over Microsoft to found the Gates Foundation. And if you look back at moguls like Carnegie and the like – same deal. They use the later philanthropy to burnish and in some ways, re-imagine, their own past legacy in the marketplace. Whether we completely believe them or give them the benefit of the doubt is certainly up to us.

I had also read the Mike Daisey book about Amazon of several years ago (2002), but now having read this one, I think I’ll go read that one again to look a bit closer from the perspective of an employee in the trenches, as was Daisey at the time he worked there (1998, fairly early on).

But getting back to this book – to sum up, I liked the book, I (again) concluded I still don’t want to work at Amazon, I respect what they’ve built, and I think it could have been done in many ways with nearly the same focus on the market but not at the expense of some of its employees along the way. And I realize I’m looking at it in hindsight and from the outside – your perspective may vary. Bezos doesn’t seem too different than most titans of tech (or other industries) to me – likely often the smartest person in the room, possibly not the guy you want to go camping with? He’s still a big enigma in many ways….maybe that will be explained in the next book about him…..

candybowl

dilbertTags: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Everything Store.

Right?

Sat ,18/01/2014

This was how I felt about the lame Sony Godzilla movie attempt of 1998! Thankfully that mistake is about to be rectified this coming May….This also makes me think of Bugs Bunny and the Lions….. 🙂

lions

candybowl

Wow….!

Wed ,04/12/2013

Yeah, it’s viral for good reason – wow. For those too scared, watch the fake Simpsons Mr. Sparkle ad below instead…. 🙂

candybowl

Beware of Mr Baker – indeed….!

Sat ,16/11/2013

Saw the ‘rockumentary’ Beware of Mr. Baker last night. It tracks the story of Ginger Baker (most famous for being in Cream) from early music days through Cream, Blind Faith and beyond until the present day. Some reactions:

1) I had only really heard his playing in the context of Cream, which ultimately limited my impressions. While I don’t completely agree with either his (stated at least a couple times rather egotistically by him in the movie) or his bands perspective that they were the ‘cream’ of the rock talent at the time (So the Beatles and others like Jimmy Page and John Entwistle weren’t? There were others too) Cream were obviously in the top tier to be sure.

But the thing I liked about the movie was that you see a LOT more of his playing in far, far different contexts, and I definitely have a new view of his abilities as a result. I had not realized he was really a jazz drummer, he considered himself a jazz drummer, and ultimately at one or two points in the movie, he attains that lofty status amongst other top-tier jazz drummers – very impressive and he definitely more than holds his own – I have a much stronger respect for him now just seeing this footage alone. While I have to say that I’ve always preferred Keith Moon‘s drumming, and will still maintain that KM may be my preferred choice for a *rock* drummer – I now think GB is definitely a far more versatile and skilled drummer who obviously crosses many more types of music having seen this film.

2) Like other famous people (and arguably worse in many ways) – he was a disaster as a father, fairly loathsome as a family man and at many times, as even a human being. It’s one thing to be devoted to drums and music above all else – fine. But why have a family and treat them so horribly? Why not just stick with groupies and be done with it? Use a condom? The mind boggles – there’s simply no excuse. We’re all human, yes – but acting this way is simply beyond the pale.

3) He reminds me in many ways of Keith Richards from the ‘too onery to die’ standpoint – but I find it hard to believe that Keith Richards was near as irascible as GB was (and still is). The movie begins with GB literally wacking the poor filmmaker hard in the face with his cane because he was mad about the film having anyone else from his life in it! While to a certain degree (they include outtakes also as the credits roll at the end) this is funny and serves to make him even more of a curmudgeon – the word ‘beware’ is certainly applicable time and again as his story unfolds.

This is definitely a movie worth watching – may be a bit too ‘music nerd’ if you aren’t into drummers, rock stars acting like the immature freaks they often are, or musicians from the 60s – but definitely worth seeing all the same.

candybowl

a. MEN!

Mon ,07/10/2013

Savage Chickens

candybowl

Sci fi interfaces vs. reality…

Wed ,18/09/2013

Gotta get this book!

candybowl

Godzilla….angst…!

Sun ,28/07/2013

I love how Savage Chickens keeps exploring the ‘inner’ side of Gojira….Maybe we’ll find out more in next year’s movie – can’t wait! Hopefully there will be a cameo where Matthew Broderick gets stepped on…or eaten…..muhahhaha!

savage chickens

candybowl

Esteban, Yobs.

Sat ,06/07/2013

So we went camping with relatives last weekend, what a great time! And during part of that time, I finally had the chance to start reading the recent Steve Jobs bio from Walter Isaacson that I got for christmas last year. This was an interesting read, if you like biographies, but I had mixed reactions to it, for the following reasons.

1) Much of the story was already familiar to me, as I grew up with those original Macs (and Amigas, and PCs, etc.) and have used most of them along the way at some point or another (I have an older Mac Pro at present, among my other bazillion computers at home). I am not a zealous Mac fanboy by any means, they serve their purpose and definitely do it well. My notable Mac gripes are beyond the scope of this review, so I’ll leave those out. I am glad they are still around, as much to keep Micro$oft honest (because Windows still sucks for the most part) as to point out what you can really do when you push hard for design and integration in a consumer OS, even when you arguably don’t have to.

2) While reading the book, it’s obvious Isaacson has made strong efforts to be balanced, even though it’s just as clear he’s a big Jobs fanboy from the very start. So while he is happy to show many (because sadly there are many) instances of Jobs being a huge jerk, Jobs being irresponsible, Jobs lording it over everyone around him, etc. – there are just as many triumphs along the way, and those are put on equal display. Some of them I think are a little overblown or hyped in a way that I would more expect to see in a press release, but this is definitely not a book that avoids showing the bad side of Jobs, and that’s a good thing.

3) One factor here I am not sure is brought out as much as it could have been is the luck factor. Like so many successful business types, regardless of industry, to hear them tell it, you’d think they planned their ridiculous success from the minute they were born and it was simply fate that led them to the pinnacle. But anyone paying actual attention knows that LUCK plays a huge part in these stories as well.

It’s true that highly focused, smart people like Jobs and similar are often the best-equipped to take overwhelming advantage of chances that come their way – and in Jobs’ case, his ‘reality distortion field’ often permitted him in many cases (but not in the end with cancer, certainly) to push his way through obstacles to create the reality he wanted and believed in. In some ways, he was both the Immovable Object or the Irresistible Force no matter what he did, because the guy simply didn’t budge. Period. But he was also very, very lucky – you can argue both sides of many of his successes that he was the key driver – but he was also just as much riding on the success of the team(s) that supported him. And (noted in the book somewhat too) if it wasn’t for the iPod (and to a lesser degree, iTunes), the second coming of Apple might have turned out very differently (because they would have ended up as part of Oracle or Sun, most likely, and possibly not even around anymore). The iPod gave them the crazy money and breathing room to really aim for the stars again, even with the Mac OS X reboot beforehand. That would never have been enough on its own.

4) One of the more interesting aspects to me about this story is of course the contrast between Bill Gates and Jobs, which isn’t the focus of the book but certainly comes up several times. And if you’ve ever watched Pirates of Silicon Valley, you’ve seen this scenario play out – arguably not really exaggerated for effect even in the movie – where Jobs gets karma put right back in his face by Gates in a direct, undeniable way. Possibly one of the few times it really happened, when you consider the book and story as a whole. Here Gates is painted a bit more nice than Jobs – but I’d wager he was just as hard to deal with and just as ‘cornholio’ in his own way – ask the crushed and discarded Micro$oft ‘partners’ or early computer companies along the way that were run over by far worse business practices than Apple ever came up with. There’s plenty of abusive behavior to go around when these kinds of stakes are at issue, and it’s certainly not confined to the tech industry, either. Ask the banks, for example.

So do I admire Steve Jobs? I admire several of his character traits – the drive, the focus, the willingness to sacrifice so much to stick to his vision in many cases, the willingness to be the lone voice even in his NeXT years, where he literally *was* the lone voice for his beliefs. And I am glad he played a central role in bringing us Pixar, a story I knew only a little about beforehand but the book tells in great detail.

But I have seen SJ’s hyper-abusive management style at work even in my own career, and it greatly tempers my admiration for his success in the end. No one has to behave that way to be successful, and there are plenty of examples out there that prove my point. It’s truly sad that so many leaders in Corporate America believe otherwise. But as SJ found out, karma is real, guys – change your ways while you still can!

And I’m not completely convinced that designing cool consumer devices (computers or otherwise) is ‘changing the world’ the way Jobs constantly evangelizes. Because changing or enriching consumer behavior is one thing – but really changing society for the better is quite another, and I’m not convinced that (just) building cool technology is a necessary means to that end. I think that it is a uniquely *American* viewpoint to believe and centralize that perspective, but the era of ‘what’s good for GM is good for America’ is long, long since past, and the same applies for Apple.

A great read and great fodder for beer-table debate, to be sure. Especially if you have an Apple or Micro$oft (yes, somehow they too exist) fanboy in your midst. 🙂

candybowl

So true!

Sat ,01/06/2013

as referenced on I Love Charts (and several blogs prior to that):

The Book:
The Book

The Movie:
The Movie

The Fan Fictions:
The Fan Fictions

candybowl